Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1184

reference
401-tree-1
name
1184
tree-preservation-order

undefined

401-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027611 50.890457)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027540 50.890449,-1.027543 50.890463,-1.027553 50.890476,-1.027569 50.890486,-1.027588 50.890492,-1.027610 50.890495,-1.027632 50.890493,-1.027652 50.890487,-1.027668 50.890477,-1.027678 50.890464,-1.027682 50.890450,-1.027679 50.890436,-1.027669 50.890424,-1.027654 50.890414,-1.027634 50.890407,-1.027612 50.890405,-1.027590 50.890407,-1.027570 50.890413,-1.027554 50.890423,-1.027544 50.890435,-1.027540 50.890449)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL